Did Patriarchal Blessings Shape History?

Isaac trembled violently after realizing he blessed the wrong son. He didn't reverse the blessing. He couldn't . . . That moment, super easy to read past, is actually one of the most theologically loaded scenes in the entire book of Genesis.

Most of us read past the patriarchal blessings in Genesis the same way. The text doesn't slow down to explain them. Lamech names his son Noah, announces he'll bring relief from the curse on the ground, and the narrative moves on. Jacob gathers all twelve sons and speaks over each one (tribal territories, political trajectories, a coming ruler) and the story continues. We absorb it as family drama or ancient religious custom. We rarely stop to ask: How do these words actually work?

That question opens up an under-examined corner of Genesis, and the answer has real implications for how we understand prophecy, the gifts of the Spirit, and the character of a God who never stopped speaking. 

In this episode, we'll discuss:

- Why the patriarchal blessings in Genesis can't be explained as lucky guesses or shrewd fatherly observation
- Why the "covenant authority" interpretation, that the patriarchs could speak things into existence by virtue of their office, is theologically dangerous
- Why the most defensible interpretation is that the patriarchs were prophesying: instruments of divine revelation, voicing what God had already shown them
- How Lamech's blessing (Genesis 5:28-29) functions as the hermeneutical template for every patriarchal blessing that follows
- What the patriarchal period reveals about the cluster argument,  and why a steady, continuous stream of prophetic activity through ordinary domestic moments challenges cessationist assumptions

The God of Genesis isn't a God who shows up in dramatic bursts. He's a God who never stopped speaking, threading his voice from generation to generation long before anyone had a formal theology of what a prophet even was. Join us to learn more!

0:00 – Introduction
0:15 – Patriarchal Blessings Overview
2:09 – Genesis Examples Surveyed
6:20 – How Do They Work?
9:33 – Speaking Things Into Existence
14:06 – Patriarchs as Prophets
15:02 – Lamech's Prophetic Fulfillment
17:00 – Cessationism Challenged

Subscribe to The Remnant Radio newsletter and receive our FREE introduction to spiritual gifts eBook. Plus, get access to: discounts, news about upcoming shows, courses and conferences - and more. Subscribe now at TheRemnantRadio.com.

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:15

Hey everybody, welcome back to the wonderful world of Remnant Radio. In this program, we're talking about patriarchal blessings. It's going to be an interesting program. You guys stay tuned. So, what is a patriarchal blessing? Well, when I speak of the patriarchs, I'm speaking of guys like Abraham, Isaac, Jacob. I'm thinking of individuals such as Lamech and Noah, who speak blessings and at time curses over their children. And those blessings and curses seem to have such a binding effect and power over the lives of individuals who are spoken to that it ultimately shapes history moving forward for them and their children's children. So it's a difficult thing to kind of grapple with because as I'm reading through my Bible in a year reading plan, and I'm kind of pushing through the text, I don't take the time to try to figure out what is going on there. I read so quickly past the text, I don't see something overtly supernatural. The author, when he's recording these accounts, is not attempting to say this is the supernatural activity that's taking place. It just records, hey, he blessed, hey, he cursed. And then if you follow the storyline carefully, you'll find that those blessings and curses seem to be fulfilled exactly as the forefather has predicted. So what's going on here? Is this just some kind of wishful thinking? Is it just a word of encouragement? Is it just some kind of binding power that's taking place with these blessings and curses? I think we're going to look through a couple of examples up front, three examples, and find that they're not really that compelling as to what is taking place with these blessings and curses. And then we're going to move over and do the final conclusion of what I think is actually taking place with these blessings and curses. So let's dive in by kind of reminding ourselves of the various kinds of patriarchal blessings that are taking place in the book of Genesis. I'm not going to run through all the accounts and I'm not going to run through all of them with great details. So what I would encourage you to do, if you're less than fuzzy on these accounts, you don't really recall them at all, maybe go pick up the book of Genesis, read it through. It'll take you an hour, hour and a half, you can come back to this video and we can discuss patriarchal blessings. But for the rest of us, let's just use this as a refresher to remind ourselves of the various blessings that are taking place in the book of Genesis. Genesis 5, 28 through 29 is the first account that really seems to express itself explicitly. We have Lamech, and he names his son Noah. He doesn't name his son Noah because he opened up a book of ancient Near Eastern baby names in an old book and says, ooh, this is a cool name. I'm going to name him Noah. Instead, he names him Noah, and the text gives us the reason why. It says this one shall bring us relief from the work and from the painful toil of our hands out of the ground that the Lord God has cursed. Now, that's an important interpretation of why he named his son Noah and the blessing that he spoke over him. This is going to be important because I think it's going to be the interpretive key for the kinds of blessings and curses we see flowing throughout the book. So we'll return to Genesis 5 momentarily. Next, let's recall Genesis 9. After the flood, Noah puts all three of his sons together, Sham, Ham, and Japheth. He curses Canaan, Ham's son, likely because of some kind of relationship that he has with Noah's wife. I know that's really complicated, maybe too much for this video. It certainly is too much for this video. Go check out Dr. Michael Heiser's work on this. You might disagree with me, you might disagree with him, whatever happened, but we know for certain that Ham does something nasty that he wasn't supposed to be doing. Could have been voyeurism, could have been something extra that's beyond voyeurism, but I'd point you to that podcast for my interpretation. Anyway, he continues. And not only does he curse Canaan, who's Ham's son, but then he blesses Shem and says to Japheth that he will be enlarged and dwell in Shem's tents. And these weren't just, again, fatherly sentiments. They actually function somewhat like constitutional documents for each of these civilizations. Each of these sons would go out and do the very things that dad kind of spoke blessings over them, as if those were the things that they were in fact going to do. Japheth's descendant did fan out across a large territory, and Canaan's line did end up under Israel's boot. Next we have Genesis 27. This one everyone knows. Isaac is old, like really old, like practically blind, right? He means to bless Esau. Rebecca and Jacob run in and scheme together. Jacob goes in wearing his brother's clothes, smelling like the field and like goats and feeling like goats. And Isaac gives him a blessing, but he gives him the blessing to the wrong kid. He won't he wanted to bless Esau, but he blesses Jacob instead. Then Esau walks in, and here's what people seem to consistently miss about this scene. Isaac trembles, physically shakes, because he doesn't reverse the blessing. He can't. He gives Esau a consolation word instead. You'll serve Jacob, but one day you'll split free from his yoke. The Edomites, or Esau's people, spent centuries under Israel's rule, and they broke loose during Jerome's reign, right on cue from what was spoken over them by their father. Then we got Genesis 48, Jacob's deathbed scene, if you will. He's getting close to death. Joseph brings in his boys. Manasseh, he puts it on the right. Ephraim, he positions on the left, because the right is where the better blessing is. Manasseh's the firstborn. Let's bless him with the better blessing. But Jacob, that old schemer, decides to cross his arms, put the right hand on Ephraim and the left hand on Manasseh. Joseph's like, Dad, you got it all backwards. That one's the younger, this one's the older. But Jacoseph basically waves them off and says, Look, I know exactly what I'm doing. Ephraim is going to be greater than his brother Manasseh. Ephraim eventually does, in fact, dominate the northern kingdom so thoroughly that the prophets just started calling the whole northern kingdom Ephraim. That's how complete this fulfillment of this blessing seemed to be. And finally, Genesis 49. Jacob gathers all twelve of his sons together and he pronounces a word over each individual one of them. These aren't simply birthday blessings, they're something that are going to affect the future of each of these men and their respective tribes. He tells Reuben, his firstborn, that he's going to lose his preeminence because of his instability. He announces that Simeon and Levi will be scattered throughout all of Israel on account of their violence. Then he declares that the scepter will not depart from Judah, a word that's going to stretch all the way to the coming of Christ. He then gives Zebulun the seashore. He describes God as being raided, but also raiding in return. He calls Napht Delite a doe set free, and he speaks of Benjamin as a ravenous wolf. Tribe by tribe, word by word, the historical record confirms all the blessings that we have the patriarch speaking over his sons. Now that's the landscape. That's the pattern that we're going to be dealing with here in this video. But the question is still on the table, and I think it's simple. How do these words actually work? So how do they work? That's a really good question. I think there's a couple of interpretations, four that I can come up with off of the top of my head. And as I wrestle through them, I think the first three are bad and potentially even dangerous because they lead towards a kind of sloppy theology. So I want to work through my first three, which I don't really like, and I'm going to lean into my fourth one as the most reliable interpretation of what's taking place in this text. Option one is the patriarchs are just guessing, right? Maybe they're just winging it. And the blessings that they speak over their kids actually happen just as they say they will. And I'm not going to spend a whole lot of time on this, maybe 30 seconds, because I don't think it really deserves any of our time. One licky guess, sure, maybe two. That's a stretch, but fine. But when you think of Jacob blessing all 12 of his sons, hitting tribal territories, military characteristics, political trajectories, and the timeline of a coming ruler all simultaneously in a single speech, that's probably just way too low to consider realistically. I mean, it's laughably, cosmically low to think that they were just guessing. Luck scales badly. I think the explanation probably collapses under the weight of its own explanation. It just doesn't work. Then we have option two. That's that these guys are just sharp observers. It's one I think probably worth talking about a little bit longer, maybe for a minute, because it's plausible, I suppose. The idea is that these patriarchs were shrewd, right? They watched their kids grow up and under their kind of political scheming, their family dynamics and their temperament, their kind of leadership styles, that maybe the fathers were just looking at these kids and going, okay, I see this destiny over your life, and it's going to flame out. So when Jacob looked at Reuben and when he said that that this one won't hold preeminence, maybe it's just because the father who was watching his son for a long time knew that he wasn't really made of the stuff necessary for a good leader. And I'll grant you that for some of the elements of these blessings, that's at least a coherent interpretation. But then we go back to Lamech. Lamech holds his newborn son and says to this child will bring relief from the curse on the ground. No relief from drought, not better farming techniques that Noah's going to implement, not a relief from regional economical slumps. It's a relief from Genesis 3, the curse that God would judicially decree over creation, and it's sued in the aftermath of Adam's fall, when God says, Cursed is the ground because of you. In pain you shall eat of it all the days of your life, thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you. So what trend was Lamech observing? What cultural development could he have possibly seen and extrapolated from this that his son would one day bring relief from this toil? What was happening in the ancient Near East that would lead this reasonable man to look at the circumstances and think, you know what? Yeah, I actually do think that Noah's going to bring relief from the ground. There's no such data point for Lamech. A relief from cosmic judicial decree isn't the sort of thing that you just see coming by watching weather patterns. This isn't shrewd observation. I think the explain explanation dies right there when we take that observation, potentially, that Jacob could use with his kids and then apply it to Lamech. I just don't think it holds water. Maybe there's a pun intended in there somewhere. Then we have point three. The patriarchs had built-in authority to speak things into existence. This is by far the most dangerous of the three that we have spoken of this far. I think the first two are sloppy. I don't know how dangerous they could be. This third one, bad, real bad, real dangerous. Uh, and for a couple of different reasons. There is an argumentation that these guys had the ontological ability, which means that their very nature, as the patriarch, gave them the office, the right, the ability to bless things and speak things out into existence. This one I want to dwell on because this one actually sounds biblical, right, from some people's perspective. It comes dressed in the right vocabulary. It can fool people who are paying attention to the text. The argument runs something like this: the patriarchs had the covenantal head, the federal representative of the household and the line that had been given through uh Adam, through Noah, that seed of the woman, and that these guys are the heads of those households and they're able to declare blessings. They possessed a kind of inherent spiritual authority within them. And when they opened their mouths and spoke blessings, those words carried a weight, not because God had revealed something to them, but because they had an office that they were administrating. The covenant headship itself was the source of power. His word, by nature of who he was, had the capacity to shape the lives of his descendants and their destinies. You hear this sort of thing in a lot of charismatic environments where we have the ability to speak things into existence. There's a bunch of argumentation that says because we're created in the image of God, God spoke things into existence, therefore we get to speak things into existence. But this really undermines the created creation distinction. And I think we need to reject this on the front end as being false and dangerous. And here's why. If Lamech functioned in the capacity as the covenant head, possessing some kind of intrinsic metaphysical ability to speak relief from the ground in order to bring a relief from the curse in Genesis 3, then this would effectively override God's word. And I don't think people actually who hold this view actually follow that thread all the way through to its end conclusion, because if they did, I think they would be as uncomfortable as I am quite quickly. The Genesis III curse wasn't a family policy. It wasn't a tribal regulation placed upon creation. It was actually something much, much higher in that it was God's decree over creation. It changed the ontological nature, the very, the very essence of what creation was because of the fall. Who has the ability to revoke such a curse that God has placed? Who has the ability to bring relief from what God has brought pressure and restraint upon? It was issued by God, who spoke existence itself into being from nothing. That God who said, Let there be light, and there was, when that God pronounced a judicial decree over creation, that decree doesn't just sit there in suspense, waiting for a man with the right credentials to walk up and overrule the decree that God has made. It's to say that God can issue a decree, but a patriarch with the right credentialing, standing in the right gap, can effectively nullify the command of God. If that's true, then God isn't actually sovereign. He's just a very important voice, and a certain uh human voice with the right office is able to stand in against him and trump his command. This third option is especially sinister, and it's more sinister than the other two that we've talked about, because it doesn't come intentionally just kind of guess at what's going on in the text. Uh, it secretly brings in some destructive teaching that you might not see on face value. No one says, oh, this person has the ability to speak things into existence, therefore it undermines God's sovereignty. It's trying to honor what God has already established with the patriarchs and the heads of their households, and it's trying to uh smuggle in unintentionally something that only God himself has, the prerogative to speak things into existence with his divine speech. And all of scripture, only one being has that ability, and it's God alone. Not because timing is favorable, not because God saw the way that creation was unfolding, but because he has the self-authenticating, self-generating word that accomplishes all that it set forth to do. It's the God of Genesis 1. And you cannot distribute the capacity downward to the human office, no matter what kind of office they're hold, and turning that office into some kind of idol. So it's not either of these three. It's not a lucky guess, it's not an observation, and it's not the ability to speak things into existence. What's the only option left for us? These men were voicing what God had already told them. That's my fourth option. I actually think they're prophesying. They're not guessing, they're not calculating, they're not leveraging some kind of built-in metaphysical power that they've been given from creation or their office as patriarchs. They're instruments of a prophetic decree, whether that came through a direct verbal revelation, through a prophetic impression, or through some kind of foreknowledge that God had granted them. The scripture doesn't always give us the specific mechanism by which these blessings are given to the patriarchs to speak over to their children. But the mechanism isn't actually the point. The point is the source. Where is this blessing coming from? It's coming from God through these patriarchs to their children. The patriarchal blessing isn't a religious ceremony, it's a delivery system for divine revelation. So let's run back to Genesis chapter 5. And I keep returning to Lamech, not because his blessing is maybe the most significant or striking, but because of actually where it falls in text. Genesis 5, 28 through 29 is the first mention of patriarchal blessings recorded in the Bible that I can see. Everything else, Noah over his sons, Isaac over Jacob, Jacob over Ephraim and Manasseh, and the whole 12 tribes oracle, it all comes afterward. Lamech is then the prototype, and it's not a small thing because the first mention of that patriarchal blessing, I think, establishes the standard for all future blessings moving forward. So we have to ask ourselves, is this prophetic and was it fulfilled? I think the answer is yes. If you look to Genesis 8.21, the flood is over, and then God speaks. This is the curse language from Genesis 3, now echoed directly here in Genesis 8. Through whom did this moment of relief come? Well, it came through Noah, the son that Lamech named. Then, a single chapter later in Genesis 9.20, Noah becomes the first person in scripture to plant a vineyard. And in the ancient world, wine isn't just a beverage, it's a standard symbol for ease and relief, a relief of laboring giving way to rest. So you've got the name Noah, which connects to the relief and relest. The reason Lemech gives the name is for a relief from the curse. And then Noah actually does the thing that he was predicted to do in this prophetic blessing, I would call it. He plants the vineyard and then produces the drink of relief, all pointing to the same moment. The threads converge too perfectly for coincidence. That's not pattern matching, that's revelation recognizing itself. And here's the payoff for our purposes. If the evidence forces us to conclude that Lamech's blessing was prophetic, and I think it does, then we're actually obligated for the sake of consistency to read every blessing that follows through that same lens. Lamech establishes the hermeneutical template, meaning the way that we read the scriptures. Every patriarch who comes after him is operating on that same principle by that same mechanism through the same source. So here's something worth sitting with as we wrap up. There's a theological position called cessationism. This view says that spiritual gifts, things like prophecy, healing, miracles, they've all ceased. And one of the more sophisticated arguments cessationists make is something that is called the cluster argument. This idea is that supernatural activity in scripture uh isn't evenly distributed across history. In fact, it clusters in specific periods. Now, again, I don't believe this position is actually tenable or true, but the argument goes like this Moses got a cluster, Elijah got a cluster, and Jesus and the apostles got a cluster. And the argument goes that these bursts of miraculous activity existed for a specific reason to authenticate the message that these men were carrying. And once that message was established, the gifts would wind down. So don't be looking for that kind of thing anymore. Jesus and the apostles delivered the message, no mass miracles. This doesn't really work on a couple of levels. One, because Jeremiah says from the time of Moses to Jeremiah's day, miracles have continued. So through that whole period of time, those activities were taking place. But we've done entire videos on the cluster argument, and I don't have time to unpack that for you today. But here's what I want you to notice specifically, because there's something I don't hear people talk enough about. It's the idea of this patriarchal period from Noah all the way to Joseph. It doesn't fit within that framework at all. And not a single towering figure was here, a single revelatory message that needed divine authentication. What you have instead is generation after generation of ordinary covenant men, fathers, through whom God actively was speaking through. Lamech hears something about his son. Noah speaks over his boys, Isaac's words outlast his body, Jacob blesses the twelve tribes and maps out the next thousand years of Israel's history. That's not a cluster. That's a current, a steady, continuous stream and flow of prophetic activity running through the most ordinary domestic moments of deathbeds and naming ceremonies and family gatherings around uh aging patriarchs, which tells us something really important about who God is and how he operates. He wasn't distant from his people during stretches of history, occasionally parachuting into a dramatic moment because things were going quiet. He was threading his voice from generation to generation, shaping human events from the inside, speaking through the fathers before anyone had an established view of what an office of a prophet even was in Israel. The God of Genesis isn't a God who shows up in clusters, he's a God who never stops speaking and leading his people. So I hope you enjoyed this kind of content. I think that there are these abstract or odd things that take place in the text of Scripture that we often don't really dive into and try to make sense of. And if you're out there and you're wanting to make sense of more of the text of scripture, I'd very much encourage you to subscribe to the channel because we have content like this all the time that we're constantly cranking out. Guys, thank you so much for tuning into this episode, and we'll see you next time.