Episode 73 - Do Not Be Deceived

Do Not Be Deceived examines recent crises and controversies in the Western Church through a deeply biblical lens, asking how deception grows, why warning signs are often ignored, and what faithful Christians must do moving forward. Grounded in Scripture, church history, and Anabaptist convictions about holiness and accountability, this episode explores false teaching, compromised leadership, spiritual discernment, and the urgent need for purification within God’s people. Through sobering biblical case studies and practical reflection, listeners are challenged to return to Scripture as the highest authority, value character over charisma, and pursue a Church culture shaped by truth, repentance, and faithful obedience to Christ.

Our Website:
Teleiostalk.ca

Transcript

Do Not Be Deceived

Welcome to Teleios Talk. Our goal is to build Spiritual maturity among Christians so that we would be complete in Christ. My name is Wendell Martens and I am the host of the Teleios Talk Podcast. I'm so glad you have joined us today. Don’t forget to like and subscribe to our channel and please share it with everyone you know.

The last couple of weeks have been very interesting, very sad, and very challenging for the Christian church. We have seen people called out of the church based on their behaviour, deviancy, and lack of Biblical leadership. 

The response has been awesome, overwhelming and - in some cases - frightening. We are seeing people in the church - accused of a culture of coverup - being exposed; and that is a good thing. Conversely, we have seen the response of those leaders, their congregants, the greater church, and many onlookers and it has - at times - been discouraging and disheartening. 

These events should shake the church. We are all guilty of becoming complacent and allowing things to grow and mature in our churches which are counter to the commission we have been given. For some, this has been shocking. For others, it feels long overdue. But this is not just about one individual or one church. This moment raises deeper questions about the state of the Western Church — about discernment, accountability, spiritual authority, and how deception can grow in Christian spaces.

So today, I'm exploring four questions:

1) How did we get here?

2) Were there warning signs we ignored?

3) Is this problem widespread in the Western Church?

4) And most importantly — what is the way forward?

Calling out the Church

How did we get here? We didn’t arrive here suddenly. This situation is the result of decades of theological drift, celebrity culture, and the elevation of spiritual experience over Biblical authority. Over time, certain streams of Christianity have shifted away from Scripture as the final authority and toward personalities, platforms, and emotional encounters. Ministries began to reward charisma more than character. Influence was encouraged and grew faster than accountability. Social media amplified voices that were compelling — not necessarily voices that were faithful. Prophetic branding became marketable. Signs, wonders, and supernatural claims became content. Some ministries promoted extraordinary spiritual experiences as a product to attain rather than cultivating holiness, repentance, and obedience.

Since the rise of charismatic churches in the 90's, the perverse attraction of emotional spiritualism has twisted Scripture, twisted churches, and twisted people. At the same time, correction began to feel unwelcome. Critics were dismissed as divisive and unloving. Concern was framed as negativity. Biblical testing was rebranded as spiritual quenching. Meanwhile, many believers — hungry for meaning, miracles, and hope — were drawn to sensational claims without being trained to test them against Scripture. So this moment is not only a failure of leadership. It is also a reflection of a Church culture that has sometimes prioritized growth over godliness, relevance over reverence, and excitement over truth. 

Were there signs we missed? Looking back, it’s hard to say the warning signs weren’t there. They were — theologically, practically, and pastorally. There were teachings that subtly elevated personal revelation above Scripture. Prophetic claims that were vague, unverifiable, or constantly shifting. Miracle stories that didn’t hold up under scrutiny and public testimonies that changed over time.

Sunday morning became a performance, scripted entertainment, and chasing after an international audience. Instead of attending our home churches we saw people following the most popular churches. There were also pastoral concerns — people reporting spiritual manipulation, emotional harm, or confusion, but not being taken seriously. Critics were often dismissed as divisive, unspiritual, or negative instead of being answered honestly.

And here’s the uncomfortable part: It wasn’t that no one noticed. It’s that speaking up often came with a cost. Questioning popular leaders could mean losing influence, friendships, ministry opportunities, or reputation. In Church cultures that sometimes confused unity with silence, many people chose quiet instead of courage. Meanwhile, emotional intensity was often mistaken for spiritual authenticity. If something felt powerful, it must be from God — even if it wasn’t grounded in Scripture.

So in many cases, we didn’t miss the signs because they were hidden. We missed them because acknowledging them felt inconvenient, uncomfortable, or threatening to systems that were benefiting from them.

Is this Rampant in the western church? That brings us to the harder question: Is this just one isolated situation? Honestly — no. This pattern shows up across much of the Western Church, in different forms. On one side, there is active distortion. Ministries that promote prophetic words without meaningful biblical testing. Movements that build identity around spectacle rather than discipleship. Prosperity teaching that treats God like a transaction. Churches that emphasize miracle culture while avoiding repentance, holiness, and discipline. This has created churches which teach inclusion, moral compromise, and Biblical naiveté cloaked in the heresy of the emergent agenda. On the other side, there is passive negligence. A blind eye like in the case of Ravi Zacherias, whose sexual misconduct was hidden, minimized, or deflected to maintain moral credibility.

Now we are being led by pastors and church leaders who avoid difficult conversations because they don’t want conflict. Churches that refuse to practice discipline because they fear appearing unloving. Denominations that protect reputation instead of confronting corruption. Christian platforms that promote sensational voices but avoid accountability. We have enabled deception simply by staying silent. And underneath it all is a deeper issue: biblical literacy has weakened. Many believers haven’t been taught how to test teaching, evaluate spiritual claims, or recognize manipulation. So instead of measuring truth by Scripture, people end up measuring it by feelings, charisma, or popularity.

What is the way forward? So where do we go from here? The answer isn’t outrage. It’s not cancel culture. And it’s not abandoning the Church. The way forward is reformation — real, biblical, and sometimes uncomfortable reformation. First, we must return to Scripture as our highest authority. Spiritual experiences, prophetic claims, and personal revelations must always submit to the Word of God — never compete with it, and never override it. Second, we need to restore real accountability. Leaders should welcome correction, not fear it. Transparency must replace image management. Church discipline — practiced lovingly and biblically — should be recovered, not avoided. Third, we need to rebuild discernment in everyday believers. Christians should be equipped to ask: Is this biblical? Is this verifiable? Does this produce holiness? Does this reflect the character of Christ? Fourth, the Church must relearn how to value character over charisma. God is not impressed by platforms, followers, or influence. He delights in faithfulness, humility, obedience, and holiness.

And beneath all of this, we need to recover the fear of God. Where God is treated casually, deception thrives. Where God is revered, truth matters more than image — and repentance becomes possible. This moment should humble us. It’s easy to point at false prophets or high-profile failures. But we should also ask, what kind of environment we helped create? What did we tolerate? What did we excuse? What did we ignore because it felt exciting or comfortable?

Scripture tells us that judgment begins with the house of God — not to destroy it, but to purify it. This moment can harden us… Or it can refine us. It can push us toward cynicism… Or it can call us back to faithfulness. If the Church chooses truth over comfort, Scripture over spectacle, and holiness over hype, then even painful exposure can become a catalyst for renewal. Not revival built on emotional highs — but renewal built on repentance, truth, and obedience.

When Spiritual Leaders Look Away

But this isn’t just a modern problem — it’s a biblical one. The patterns we see today didn’t begin with contemporary scandals or recent controversies. Scripture itself gives us sobering examples of leaders who knew sin was present, yet allowed it to grow. Not always out of malice — sometimes out of fear, pride, or a desire to keep the peace. So, I'd like to walk through four biblical case studies — one from the Old Testament and three from the New Testament — and ask what they reveal about leadership, accountability, and the cost of looking away.

1) Eli and his sons

Let’s begin in the Old Testament, with a man named Eli. Eli was the high priest of Israel — a spiritual authority, a teacher of the Law, someone entrusted with guarding the holiness of God’s house. He wasn’t a pagan ruler or an outsider. He was a religious leader. And yet, Scripture tells us something startling: “Now the sons of Eli were worthless men. They did not know the Lord.” — 1 Samuel 2:12

His sons were abusing their priestly authority. They were exploiting worshippers, taking offerings dishonestly, and committing sexual immorality at the entrance of the tent of meeting. This wasn’t rumor or hidden sin. It was public. It was known. And Eli knew it too. “Now Eli was very old, and he kept hearing all that his sons were doing to all Israel.”— 1 Samuel 2:22

Eli does confront them — but only verbally. He warns them. He expresses concern. Yet he does not restrain them. He does not remove them from their duties. He does not act decisively to protect God’s people or God’s house. And God’s response is sobering: “I am about to punish his house forever… because his sons were blaspheming God, and he did not restrain them.” — 1 Samuel 3:13

Eli’s failure wasn’t just what his sons did. It was what he allowed. This sets a biblical pattern we’ll see again: God holds spiritual leaders accountable not only for committing sin — but for tolerating it.

2) The Pharisees

Now move forward to the New Testament and consider the Pharisees. These were the religious elite of Israel — Scripture teachers, moral authorities, and the defenders of tradition. On the surface, they appeared deeply devoted to God. But Jesus exposes something beneath the surface. “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and the plate, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence.” — Matthew 23:25

They were skilled at maintaining appearances. They emphasized outward holiness, while tolerating inward corruption — pride, manipulation, hypocrisy, and abuse of power. Jesus tells them: “You nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition.” — Matthew 15:6

Instead of confronting sin, they built systems to manage it. Instead of protecting people, they protected their authority. Instead of honoring God’s Word, they reshaped it to defend their image. This is a second pattern: Spiritual leaders who do not confront sin — but manage optics. They preserve reputation. They maintain religious credibility. They keep the system running — even if the system is sick. And Jesus gives a chilling warning: “If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit.” — Matthew 15:14

When leaders refuse to address corruption, they don’t just fall alone — they take others with them.

3) The Corinthian Church

Next, let’s look at the church in Corinth. Paul writes with shock: “It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you… and of a kind that is not tolerated even among pagans.” — 1 Corinthians 5:1 

A man in the church is living in open sexual sin. Everyone knows it. But what’s striking is that Paul doesn’t only rebuke the man — he rebukes the church. “And you are arrogant! Ought you not rather to mourn?” — 1 Corinthians 5:2

They tolerated sin in the name of grace. They confused love with permissiveness. They mistook mercy for moral neutrality. Paul warns them: “A little leaven leavens the whole lump.” — 1 Corinthians 5:6

Unchecked sin spreads. Unaddressed corruption multiplies. Silence doesn’t heal — it infects. This is another pattern: Spiritual leaders and communities that avoid discipline because they fear appearing unloving — and in doing so, allow harm to grow.

4) The churches of Revelation

Finally, consider Jesus’ letters to the churches in Revelation. These are not secular institutions. These are Christian congregations. And again, notice what Jesus rebukes: “You tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess and is teaching and seducing my servants.” — Revelation 2:20 

And elsewhere: “I have this against you, that you tolerate the teaching of the Nicolaitans.” — Revelation 2:15 Pay attention to the word tolerate. Jesus doesn’t say, “You invented this.” He says, “You allowed this.” They permitted false teaching. They allowed spiritual corruption. They let deception remain in God’s house. And Jesus does not praise their tolerance. He calls them to repentance. Because love without truth is not love. And unity without holiness is not unity.

Purification, Truth, and the Church

In the Anabaptist tradition, the Church is not measured by size, influence, or spectacle — it is measured by faithfulness to Christ, obedience to His Word, and the integrity of its disciples. Our concern is not simply with scandals or high-profile failures, but with the deeper question: Are we living as a holy, accountable community under the Lordship of Jesus?

Let’s reflect on how sin, compromise, and silence among leaders allow corruption to take root — whether in ancient Israel, the early Church, or contemporary movements. Scripture is clear: the health of the Church depends on courage, confession, and correction. As Anabaptists, we believe that true discipleship requires confronting sin, walking in humility, and following Christ together in community.

I've discussed contemporary concerns in movements like those surrounding Bethel Church, and we’ve looked at how Scripture itself records spiritual leaders who tolerated sin until it became a crisis. What connects both Scripture and modern experience is this: God’s heart for His Church is both merciful and purifying. The Apostle Paul tells us that Christ loved the Church so deeply that He gave Himself up for her with the express purpose that He might “sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word” (Ephesians 5:25–26). This is not merely poetic language — it is theological truth. God’s method of transformation for His people is cleansing through His Word.

The Scriptures do not present God as a bystander to sin within the Church, letting things slide for the sake of unity. Instead, holiness is the goal. The very next verse says Christ intends to present the Church “holy and blameless and beyond reproach” (Ephesians 5:27). This is a high aim — and it requires active purification, not passive tolerance.

Purification, in the biblical sense, means facing the truth about sin, calling it what it is, and submitting it to Christ for healing. When leaders and communities allow compromise to persist, what happens is exactly what we see in Scripture: sin metastasizes. In Corinth, for example, Paul rebukes the church because they were arrogant rather than grieving over sinful behavior among them (1 Corinthians 5:1–2). The problem wasn’t merely the sin of one man — it was the tolerance of sin within the community.

What we see today in some parts of the Church — patterns of denial, avoidance, protection of reputation, or refusal to confront error — are not anomalies. They are symptoms of a deeper failure to let Christ’s sanctifying Word do its work in us. And this is where purity begins: not with finger‑pointing, but with confession, repentance, and a willingness to let God refine His Bride.

If purification is God’s desire for His Church, then truth is the means by which purification takes place. Truth is not convenient, politically correct, or always pleasant; it is what God has revealed in Scripture. Paul writes clearly that all Scripture is “God‑breathed and useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16). This verse is foundational: Scripture by definition corrects and reproves. God’s Word does not merely comfort; it confronts.

Christian philosopher and apologist G. K. Chesterton, once observed that the modern world tends to resist correction precisely because it mistakes comfort for truth. He wrote that the Christian ideal isn’t beloved because it’s easy, but often precisely because it’s hard — “The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried.” Chesterton didn’t write as a theologian quoting Scripture, but his insight reflects a biblical reality: truth always costs something.

And Scripture itself tells us that compromise with sin yields no lasting peace. Jesus warned the Pharisees that by caring more for their traditions and reputation than for obedience to God’s Word, they nullified Scripture (Matthew 15:6–9). When leaders prioritize preservation of influence or image over confronting wrongdoing, they betray the mission Christ entrusted to His Church.

Confronting sin, naming error, and calling for holiness — this is love in the biblical sense. Proverbs states, “Faithful are the wounds of a friend” (Proverbs 27:6). Love that fails to call people to truth ultimately fails them. If Jerusalem’s leaders had confronted the creeping legalism and hypocrisy Jesus rebuked, the Pharisaical compromise might not have led to national tragedy. The same principle holds for us: Truth is costly — but false peace is more costly.

When we look back to the early Church — the Fathers who defended the faith amidst heresies and apostasy — we find a remarkably consistent elevation of Scripture as the groundwork for discernment and correction. Saint Athanasius, writing in the 4th century amid Arian controversy, insisted that “the holy and inspired Scriptures are sufficient for the preaching of the truth.” He understood Scripture as the standard by which all teaching must be judged. He affirmed that Scripture contains the truth necessary for teaching, reproof, and correction.

Augustine of Hippo — whose writings shaped Western theology deeply — likewise insisted that Christians should cling to nothing more firmly than the authority of Scripture. He wrote, “What more shall I teach you than what we read in the Apostle? For Holy Scripture fixes the rule for our doctrine, lest we dare to be wiser than we ought.” Basil the Great put the matter succinctly: those taught in Scripture ought to test what is said by teachers and “accept that which agrees with the Scriptures but reject what is foreign.”

These voices are not nostalgic relics; they embody the early Church’s conviction that Scripture serves to anchor the Church in truth — not optional sentiment, but authoritative correction. When leaders and communities drift from Scripture’s clear teaching, they open the door to the very errors Scripture warns against. If Scripture is our compass, then departure from it is directional loss — the Church becomes unmoored and vulnerable to every wind of doctrine. Only God’s Word rightly discerns truth from error, light from darkness, holiness from compromise.

This brings us to the future. If the Church today is being called to purification, how do we respond? The first step is always personal: every Christian must humbly submit to Scripture’s authority in their own life. Sanctification begins not with institutions, but with individuals whose hearts are aligned with God’s revealed truth. Holiness is not an optional accessory to Christian life. As J. C. Ryle, an evangelical pastor and teacher on sanctification, put it, “Holiness is the habit of being of one mind with God, according as we find His mind described in Scripture.” If we want renewal in the Church, it must arise from lives that measure everything — doctrine, conduct, leadership — by Scripture’s standard.

Second, this future requires courageous truth‑telling with grace. Truth without love becomes sharp judgment; love without truth becomes mere sentiment. The Church’s witness requires both. When sin is confronted in a spirit of repentance and restoration, the Church is sanctified rather than splintered. Finally, we must remember that purification leads to hope. Paul reminds us that Christ’s intention is not eternal condemnation but the final presentation of the Church holy and without blemish (Ephesians 5:27).  The Lord disciplines those He loves (Hebrews 12:6), not to destroy them but to refine them.

Outro

God’s Church cannot thrive where sin is tolerated and truth is compromised. From Eli’s sons in Israel, to the corruption Jesus rebuked in the Pharisees, to the unchecked immorality in Corinth, to the tolerated error in the churches of Revelation, Scripture consistently warns that the consequences of inaction are grave. Yet even in this sobering reality, hope remains — a hope anchored not in human leaders, institutions, or fleeting popularity, but in Christ Himself. He purifies His Bride through Scripture, through correction, and through faithful hearts willing to obey Him. He calls us to confession, repentance, and courageous accountability.

The Anabaptist witness reminds us that discipleship is costly: it requires walking in obedience, confronting sin, and nurturing community rooted in God’s Word. But it is precisely in this obedience, in this refusal to compromise, that renewal is possible. The Church that chooses not to see sin, not to name it, and not to surrender to it, will witness Christ’s refining work — a holy, faithful, and enduring community, ready for His return.